Rajasthan electricity board v. mohan lal
Webb• Mohan Lal was placed provisionally- never became permanent servant of Board – made permanent with PWD. • In the petition, Mohan Lal contended that • On abolition of Govt Dept., he had no lien with the Govt. and his services were permanently transferred to the Board. Similar to other respondents- same conditions are applicable. • SC – WebbMohan Lal AIR 1967 SC 1857 – Trace Your Case Electricity Board, Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal AIR 1967 SC 1857 ISSUE: Whether the concerned authority fell within the meaning of a …
Rajasthan electricity board v. mohan lal
Did you know?
WebbSupreme Court has held in Electricity Board, Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 S.C. 1857 that to be within the expression, "Other authority", all authorities created by the Constitution or Statute must get power under the law. So this interpretation, State Electricity Boards are the State within the meaning of Article 12. The appeal was raised by the Electricity Board on two grounds. 1. The Learned Counsel of the Petitioner (S.T. Desai) submitted the first ground that Mohanlal had never worked for the Board as a permanent employee or in a meaningful position, thus he could not claim to be considered for promotion with the … Visa mer The case deals with the scope of the term ‘State’ defined under Article 12 of the Indian Constitution and the word ‘local authority’. A petition … Visa mer Article 12 of the Indian Constitution defines the term ‘State’. Unless the context otherwise requires, the word ‘State’ shall include The … Visa mer The case is a Special leave appeal filed by the State Electricity Board of Rajasthan before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India against the order … Visa mer Mohanlal, and the other 10 workers were all provisionally placed at the disposal of the Electricity Board of Rajasthan, Jaipur by a notification issued by the Government on 12th February 1958, … Visa mer
Webb2 Electricity Board, Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 SC 1857 Supreme Court rejected the interpretation in Santa Bai’s case and held that the expression ‘other authorities’ is wide enough to include all authorities created by the Constitution or statute on whom the power is conferred by law. WebbMohan Lal and Ors. (1) and in Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur v. Shrikishan and Anr. (2), I am of the opinion that the learned Senior Civil Judge, did not commit any error when he held that the plaintiff had lien in the State Service on a post equivalent to Helper-I.
Webbasthan Electric v. Mohan Lal The Supreme Court held in the case of Electricity Board, Rajasthan v. Mohan Lal, that the term bther authorities' is wide enough to include all the authorities created by the Constitution and on whom powers were conferred by law. The statutory authority so coming under this purview need Webb18 aug. 2011 · Rajasthan State Electricity Board & Others v/s Mohanlal & Another Civil Regulation First Appeal No. 149 of 1990 Decided On, 18 August 2011 At, High Court of Rajasthan By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN For the Appellants: R.K. Singhal, Advocate. For the Respondents: A.K. Asharya, Advocate. …
WebbRajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur v/s Mohan Lal and Others Civil Appeal No. 466 of 1966 Decided On, 03 April 1967 At, Supreme Court of India By, HON'BLE JUSTICE V. …
Webb18 aug. 2011 · Rajasthan State Electricity Board & Ors. v. Shri Mohanlal & Anr. Narendra Kumar Jain, J.:—. This appeal on behalf of defendants under Section 96 of the Code of … calhn injury managementWebbRespondent No. 1, Mohan Lal, as well as respondents 4 to 14 were all permanent employees of the State Government holding posts of Foremen in the Electrical and Mechanical Department. calhn intranet home pageWebb2 dec. 2024 · The Supreme Court was asked to decide in Rajasthan Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal whether the Rajasthan Electricity Board was an “authority” as defined by the term “other authorities” in Article 12. calhn hasdsWebbrajasthan state electricity board jaipur vs. mohan lal - supreme court of india (from: rajasthan) - april 03, 1967. rajasthan state electricity board jaipur vs. mohan lal. laws(sc)-1967-4-19 ... mohan lal respondents. referred judgements :-ujjam bai vs. state of uttar pradesh [followed] calhn m60 formWebbIn Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lal, AIR 1967 SC 1857 it was observed that the Electricity (Supply) Act showed that the Rajasthan Electricity Board had power to give directions, the disobedience of which was punishable as a criminal offence. The power to issue directions and to enforce compliance was held to be an important aspect. calhn leave formcalhn meaningWebbMohan Lal and Ors. . The Supreme Court in the above case had considered the meaning of State under Article 12of the Constitution of India and under that Article it was held that the Rajasthan State Electricity Board is State within the meaning of that Article. calhn m60 referral form